Whether it is Top 40 or classical or R&B, artists and music have a recognizable look and feel. When looking at frameworks, some simply provide us with a bag of instruments, while others provide us with chord progressions and album covers we can customize.
Probably the most common question we get asked as we get to know an organization is “What framework should I use?” No matter what some people would have you believe there is no straightforward answer. The answer though is founded in our typical response of “What are you trying to do?”
Recently, we explored some of the habits that can sap the effectiveness of a developer. Even the best of us can get bogged down by challenges that make us struggle for too long. We believe that developers who better understand themselves and can identify these challenges before the bandwidth drain are more likely to be happy, satisfied, and productive. Do you recognise any of these bad habits?
As many of you know, Dojo 2 is being built on TypeScript. Many of us involved in Dojo 2 believe that TypeScript brings several advantages to developing with web technologies these days. Features like structural typing and interfaces help us write code that is less prone to errors as well as being able to express to those consuming Dojo 2 what the intent of the code is.
If you have worked with Dojo 1 for any extended period of time, you will realise how feature rich and complex the Dojo Toolkit is. Because of the power and backwards compatibility of Dojo 1, it can often be daunting, even for an experienced user, to effectively use Dojo. If as a developer, you need to utilise a new part of Dojo, it can be confusing to understand what part of the API to use and how to use it. I know from personal experience, I would often review the test cases for a part of Dojo I wasn’t familiar with to try to figure out what the intent of the original author was.
As we have continued to work on Dojo 2, several of us realised that TypeScript could offer a lot to Dojo 1, potentially allowing people to start to migrate code to TypeScript and ES6+, making their current code even better, but giving them an easier path to the future. In order to be effective at using TypeScript with Dojo 1, we need to do a bit of enablement.
Recently on GitHub, someone accused Dojo 2 of being vapourware. This opinion came from a position of misinformation. I was glad the individual then engaged with the Dojo 2 project to understand where we are today. We are making swift progress and a beta is on the horizon. It has taken Dojo 2 a long time to get here and to really solidify our vision. We first started brainstorming about plans for 2.0 almost 5 years ago! Around a year ago we solidified our plans and have been unwavering in moving down that path.
I attended the Microsoft Edge Web Summit in San Francisco. I will be honest, outside of meeting a few people, I wasn’t expecting much. Instead, I found myself face-to-face with the “new” Microsoft. I have grown accustomed to the openness and true collaboration that the TypeScript team have engaged in, but I wasn’t expecting seeing this mode
infecting cross-pollinating the rest of the company. What I saw was far from a marketing ploy. It felt as if Microsoft was going through a revolution from the inside out.
Adam Klien, software engineer at Google, announced on ESDiscuss that they were withdrawing the proposal to implement
Object.observe and plan to remove it from V8 by the end of the year.
Object.observe, they assured me the other browsers would eventually implement the rest of Web Components. I also missed that Polymer 1.0 abandoned